Baka-Updates.com

by **newleaf** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 6:16 pm

uchihashinobi wrote:As for blaming myspace that's just bullshit....but at the moment the family needs someone to blame, and they are directing their anger towards them instead of their son....it's called denial. One of the first stages of grief over death.

Heh. They fail at taking responsibility.

p.s. Jesus may have died a virgin, but it was just in anticipation of all the pussy he was gonna score upon ascending. In fact, the whole stint was probably a roundabout way of scoring with some woman he had his eyes on.

Angel chick: "You sacrificed yourself for mankind? You're so brave, Jesus."
Jesus: "You better believe it, baby."

by **Cataulin** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 6:58 pm

newleaf wrote:Angel chick: "You sacrificed yourself for mankind? You're so brave, Jesus."
Jesus: "You better believe it, baby."

by **Vlastokov** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:12 pm

Dogma owns you

by **newleaf** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:46 pm

The man probably doesn't even need a pick-up line.
"Jesus, Son of God. How you doin'?" *wink*

by **Vlastokov** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:47 pm

Family Guy, anyone?

When God and Jesus are picking up chicks at the pub? Anyone?

by **Xandra Kitee** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:13 pm

newleaf wrote:The man probably doesn't even need a pick-up line.
"Jesus, Son of God. How you doin'?" *wink*

Lol. =^^=

by **SeeG** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 12:46 am

hmmm
the one you love the most out of everything on the earth commits suicide
how would you feel?
your mom or paps?
the only friend you've ever had?
..suddenly kills themself

by **emetic** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 12:58 am

This thread is coo lindeed.

Um,
so yeah,

doesn't matter lol. It makes me wonder whether I'm wiser than half of you or less wise o_O but no one will ever know.. except Buddy Christ there. /no1

right back at ya, bro.

on a facetious side note, in the parents' position, I'd also sue Myspace. Possibility of large sums of money for free are good. It's like a lottery but with waaay better odds... I should think that if I had a son who killed himself I'd kinda be feeling a little .. um.. hollow.. there's no real way to take responsibility for that, so why not just biff the morals and go for money?

by **Vlastokov** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:04 am

Cuz the notion is absurd. It didn't hold up in court at all.

by **emetic** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:38 am

Bah, I was actually expecting it to. Their lawyer was obviously not paid enough.

by **Lucky-7** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:40 am

Vlastokov wrote:Cuz the notion is absurd. It didn't hold up in court at all.

by **Vlastokov** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:58 am

Haahahaha. Nice pic.

by **Ris** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:51 am

I have no respect for parents who sue for vast amount of money upon a child of theirs dying. I don't mean to sound harsh to the parents I know they have suffered a huge loss and i hope to never understand what that feels like...

But step back at it and look at it. You are essentially saying, my kid is dead and you may be to blame...by taking alot of your money it will benefit us. There is no way to look at this in a good light.

If money eases the pain of your lost child then you are not good parents

Put in this position i would only ever demand that compensation was paid to cover say a funeral bill or medical costs...i would never attempt to gain personal benefit through something tradgic like that

by **derrio** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 10:00 am

Lucky-7 wrote:
Vlastokov wrote:Cuz the notion is absurd. It didn't hold up in court at all.

http://img234.imageshack.us/img234/3350/usa3oj.png

That's Brad Pitt giving the thumbs up. ROFLSAUCE!

by **emetic** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:16 pm

Ris wrote:If money eases the pain of your lost child then you are not good parents

It's not about the parents gaining money; if the parents truly believe a company is to blame for the death, it's the responsible thing to do to sue the company so they are forced to change what they're doing before anyone else's kid is destroyed by the large company's actions.
to not sue would be disrespecting every other family and teenager who could be affected.

Um, a larger monetary claim makes the offending company sorrier for its actions and gives them more incentive to be non-harmful, as well as bringing increased public awareness to the dangerousness of the offending company.

Yeah.

by **Lucky-7** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:52 pm

Sauce is yakitate japan manga.

And Emmy is once again right, it's not really about "the money" it's about hitting a company in the only place it hurts; the wallet. Had it been a single person it wouldnt have been a finacial attack but a more personnal one.

by **newleaf** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 3:46 pm

And yet you never hear about any of these people that win doing honorable things with the money. Donating to charity, perhaps?

Lucky-7 wrote:And Emmy is once again right, it's not really about "the money" it's about hitting a company in the only place it hurts; the wallet.

Haha. I like that. It's all about revenge.

by **emetic** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 3:49 pm

newleaf wrote:And yet you never hear about any of these people that win doing honorable things with the money. Donating to charity, perhaps?

But I do o_o well, occasionally XD very occasionally.

Hmm.

by **Vlastokov** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:10 pm

emetic wrote:
Ris wrote:If money eases the pain of your lost child then you are not good parents

It's not about the parents gaining money; if the parents truly believe a company is to blame for the death, it's the responsible thing to do to sue the company so they are forced to change what they're doing before anyone else's kid is destroyed by the large company's actions.
to not sue would be disrespecting every other family and teenager who could be affected.

Um, a larger monetary claim makes the offending company sorrier for its actions and gives them more incentive to be non-harmful, as well as bringing increased public awareness to the dangerousness of the offending company.

Yeah.

Sure, if that was the case, but MySpace did absolutely nothign to warrant a lawsuit. One retarded member leaving a bulletin is hardly reason to blame MySpace for "dangerousness". In fact, I'd say that they had nothing at all to do with the suicide.

by **Lucky-7** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:46 pm

I wonder... I've seriously insulted a lot of emos up until now, perhaps someone could sue me over one of their suicide?

I'd lol in the witness box, they'd fry me.

by **Komataguri** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 9:08 pm

Lucky-7 wrote:I wonder... I've seriously insulted a lot of emos up until now, perhaps someone could sue me over one of their suicide?

I'd lol in the witness box, they'd fry me.

Well, if you can sue for stupidity... I'm sure you'd have alot more suits to worry about than just emo's... :ph43r:

by **derrio** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 9:13 pm

Komataguri wrote:
Lucky-7 wrote:I wonder... I've seriously insulted a lot of emos up until now, perhaps someone could sue me over one of their suicide?

I'd lol in the witness box, they'd fry me.

Well, if you can sue for stupidity... I'm sure you'd have alot more suits to worry about than just emo's...

*cough*McD's Coffee*cough*

*cough*guygettingfatoffMcD's*cough*

by **Vlastokov** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 9:15 pm

Nah, they can't do shit to you over the intrawebz. There was a forum that aided somebody in a homicide-turned-suicide and nothing happened to them.

by **Lucky-7** » Sat Dec 17, 2005 2:38 am

Vlastokov wrote:Nah, they can't do shit to you over the intrawebz. There was a forum that aided somebody in a homicide-turned-suicide and nothing happened to them.

I'd like a sauce on that.

by **Vlastokov** » Sat Dec 17, 2005 6:33 am

Here ya go.

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1711278

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/10/29/state/n161713D29.DTL

Whoa.

Baka-Updates.com

ROFFLECOPTER

Who is online