PS3 Wii XBox360

A forum dedicated to game and game related discussions. Discuss all about the First Person Shooter, or Strategy games or even the MMORPGS. What about that Playstation? Talk about that here too!

Moderators: Mensco, MidnightDemon, DriftngAsh, Lucky-7, Moderators

Postby EvilSquirrel » Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:01 pm

Nintendo has this weird concept of designing a console around having fun

Bollocks I say, where are my high res textures!?
User avatar
EvilSquirrel
I <3 Forums
 
Posts: 3641
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:54 pm
Location: GENTLEMEN

Postby frumplstlskn » Mon Dec 18, 2006 11:18 pm

I'm fucking done with RPGs. I've come to the realization that they just suck... A lot of the time they bore the hell out of me, just to get new plot points and story development when I could be reading a novel or watching animu to get the same effect in less time. I don't even really have a want to play rpgs anymore, I just want games that keep me excited and having fun. WELL, then again, if the rpg's are portable I could see a large exception, because one of the main problems I have with them is having to sit on my ass doing rpg stuff for hours. Being able to move around makes all the difference.
User avatar
frumplstlskn
Prince of Spam
 
Posts: 6550
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:09 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C.

Postby mrharvest » Tue Dec 19, 2006 12:38 am

Out of curiosity frumpl, does your frustration apply mainly to (classic) JRPGs or all CRPGs?

After DQ8 I swore I'll never ever again buy a game with random battles.
Now I've gone back to the roots and spent the entire week playing only roguelikes. And I'm having a blast. I think CRPGs aren't just about the stories. A lot of the appeal in good games comes from obsessing over the ultimate character build (which there isn't if the designers were clever, so you'll spend time trying out different stuff and then going back to do some more tweaking to see if you could yet improve it) and other 'trivial' stuff.
Image
User avatar
mrharvest
Normal Spammer
 
Posts: 2015
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:52 pm
Location: 1999

Postby frumplstlskn » Tue Dec 19, 2006 12:56 am

JRPGs, and don't even start me on mmorpgs... CRPGs?
User avatar
frumplstlskn
Prince of Spam
 
Posts: 6550
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:09 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C.

Postby Mystic Thunder » Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:06 am

CRPG= Classoc Role-Playing Game.

kinda like neverwinter nights and such.

i looked at the line up for the ps3 after the first 4 months. there are 11 games I want to play.

On the 360 there are only 3 games I want to play.

PS3 wins my vote, especially since I can play my old skool ps1 games.
Image
User avatar
Mystic Thunder
Prince of Spam
 
Posts: 6647
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 5:24 am
Location: Kuwait

Postby mrharvest » Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:08 am

CRPGs = Computer (or arguably even console stuff) RPGs. Just to differentiate it from proper RPGs, you know the kind you play with your mates sitting around a table.
Image
User avatar
mrharvest
Normal Spammer
 
Posts: 2015
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:52 pm
Location: 1999

Postby Yumi » Tue Dec 19, 2006 5:32 am

GO PS1 FOR THE WIN!
I'LL TAKE YOU TO A GAY BAR
User avatar
Yumi
Noob Spammer
 
Posts: 1387
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:24 am
Location: gay bar

Postby Lucky-7 » Tue Dec 19, 2006 5:58 am

frumplstlskn wrote:I'm fucking done with RPGs. I've come to the realization that they just suck... A lot of the time they bore the hell out of me, just to get new plot points and story development when I could be reading a novel or watching animu to get the same effect in less time. I don't even really have a want to play rpgs anymore, I just want games that keep me excited and having fun. WELL, then again, if the rpg's are portable I could see a large exception, because one of the main problems I have with them is having to sit on my ass doing rpg stuff for hours. Being able to move around makes all the difference.


QFT


Yumi wrote:GO PS1 FOR THE WIN!


Better yet, fire up an emulator and njoy the full library from the comfort of your pc chair!

FINALLY I can chat, browse, play AND masturbate ALL FROM THE SAME CHAIR

it is truly a superb era we live in.

and now, back to my emulated fun!



Image
User avatar
Lucky-7
Moderator
 
Posts: 5738
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 5:55 pm

Postby KunJinky » Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:11 am

Mystic Thunder wrote:PS3 wins my vote, especially since I can play my old skool ps1 games.

For now, you're better off playing PS1 games on a PS1 or PS2 due to the compatibility issues.
ு_ு
KunJinky
Elite Spammer
 
Posts: 4241
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 12:41 pm

Postby Vlastokov » Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:31 am

and mammory cards.
Image
Komataguri wrote:But I only sing praise of the great Vlastokov

The omnipotent master of all creation!
User avatar
Vlastokov
I am Spam!
 
Posts: 11684
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: University of Florida/Miami, Florida

Postby Komataguri » Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:01 am

KunJinky wrote:
Mystic Thunder wrote:PS3 wins my vote, especially since I can play my old skool ps1 games.

For now, you're better off playing PS1 games on a PS1 or PS2 due to the compatibility issues.


Yeah, cause 100 obscure titles out of tens of thousands, most of which still play just fine except for a minor gltch like no opening movie, that they are working on fixing, spells DOOM FOR SONY


DOOM I SAY, DOOOOOOOOM~
Image
http://www.firefoxmyths.com
Shakedown 1979 wrote:Koma youre just the epitome of manliness
User avatar
Komataguri
Royalty
 
Posts: 5923
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Shakedown's House

Postby KunJinky » Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:41 am

Komataguri wrote:
KunJinky wrote:
Mystic Thunder wrote:PS3 wins my vote, especially since I can play my old skool ps1 games.

For now, you're better off playing PS1 games on a PS1 or PS2 due to the compatibility issues.


Yeah, cause 100 obscure titles out of tens of thousands, most of which still play just fine except for a minor gltch like no opening movie, that they are working on fixing, spells DOOM FOR SONY


DOOM I SAY, DOOOOOOOOM~

And despite your overcompensation efforts, I have more faith than you.
Will Sony fix the problems? Probably.
Is backwards compatibility a deciding reason to get a PS3 or trash your PS2 right this instant? No.
With compatibility so up in the air it's as vague as emulators.
ு_ு
KunJinky
Elite Spammer
 
Posts: 4241
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 12:41 pm

Postby Komataguri » Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:32 am

KunJinky wrote:
Komataguri wrote:
KunJinky wrote:
Mystic Thunder wrote:PS3 wins my vote, especially since I can play my old skool ps1 games.

For now, you're better off playing PS1 games on a PS1 or PS2 due to the compatibility issues.


Yeah, cause 100 obscure titles out of tens of thousands, most of which still play just fine except for a minor gltch like no opening movie, that they are working on fixing, spells DOOM FOR SONY


DOOM I SAY, DOOOOOOOOM~

And despite your overcompensation efforts, I have more faith than you.
Will Sony fix the problems? Probably.
Is backwards compatibility a deciding reason to get a PS3 or trash your PS2 right this instant? No.
With compatibility so up in the air it's as vague as emulators.



Yeah, support for 99.998% of the game titles really is up in the air and vauge as fuck.
Image
http://www.firefoxmyths.com
Shakedown 1979 wrote:Koma youre just the epitome of manliness
User avatar
Komataguri
Royalty
 
Posts: 5923
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Shakedown's House

Postby silverace99 » Tue Dec 19, 2006 12:14 pm

Please, please do not turn this thread into a fanboy arena. Good lord just go buy whatever system you like better.
Image
Image
User avatar
silverace99
I > U
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:20 am
Location: san jose, california

Postby KunJinky » Tue Dec 19, 2006 12:27 pm

Komataguri wrote:
KunJinky wrote:
Komataguri wrote:
KunJinky wrote:
Mystic Thunder wrote:PS3 wins my vote, especially since I can play my old skool ps1 games.

For now, you're better off playing PS1 games on a PS1 or PS2 due to the compatibility issues.


Yeah, cause 100 obscure titles out of tens of thousands, most of which still play just fine except for a minor gltch like no opening movie, that they are working on fixing, spells DOOM FOR SONY


DOOM I SAY, DOOOOOOOOM~

And despite your overcompensation efforts, I have more faith than you.
Will Sony fix the problems? Probably.
Is backwards compatibility a deciding reason to get a PS3 or trash your PS2 right this instant? No.
With compatibility so up in the air it's as vague as emulators.



Yeah, support for 99.998% of the game titles really is up in the air and vauge as fuck.

It is when you're making numbers up... :/

I'm not being negative, don't see what you're getting worked up over.
ு_ு
KunJinky
Elite Spammer
 
Posts: 4241
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 12:41 pm

Postby Khaotic » Tue Dec 19, 2006 12:35 pm

Komataguri wrote:PS3 has all the Super triple S+++ games of PS1 and Grand Theft Auto


GTA is boring now. Its the same game over and over <_<
Khaotic
Noob Lurker
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:34 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Postby Komataguri » Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:06 pm

Khaotic wrote:
Komataguri wrote:PS3 has all the Super triple S+++ games of PS1 and Grand Theft Auto


GTA is boring now. Its the same game over and over <_<


Like every other fucking game in existance,and like 90% of TV shows.


So...why don't you get in this canoe made of care, sail down your river of tears, and find someone who actually gives a fuck?
Image
http://www.firefoxmyths.com
Shakedown 1979 wrote:Koma youre just the epitome of manliness
User avatar
Komataguri
Royalty
 
Posts: 5923
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Shakedown's House

Postby 10sigh » Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:14 pm

Oh Jesus, is it fanboys' planned purchase justification time again?
Best statement in this thread:

mrharvest wrote:So what to choose? I believe the only choice a gamer can make is buy all three.


The rest is mostly frustrated "sour grapes" bullshit rambling of people too broke or too cheap to afford all systems.
Yeah yeah, keep believing you're not missing out at all and there isn't a single fun game on the systems you won't own. Denial works wonders.

Right now I think X360 is the "best" console objectively viewed because it has the same capabilities as the PS3 (if you check comparison shots, many multi platform games even look better on it) without the ridiculous price tag and a better game library. Wii is obviously a matter of taste and can't really be compared.
We'll see how things shift in 2007.
Image
_________________
User avatar
10sigh
Super Lurker
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 4:01 am

Postby Komataguri » Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:20 pm

10sigh wrote:Oh Jesus, is it fanboys' planned purchase justification time again?
Best statement in this thread:

mrharvest wrote:So what to choose? I believe the only choice a gamer can make is buy all three.


The rest is mostly frustrated "sour grapes" bullshit rambling of people too broke or too cheap to afford all systems.
Yeah yeah, keep believing you're not missing out at all and there isn't a single fun game on the systems you won't own. Denial works wonders.

Right now I think X360 is the "best" console objectively viewed because it has the same capabilities as the PS3 (if you check comparison shots, many multi platform games even look better on it) without the ridiculous price tag and a better game library. Wii is obviously a matter of taste and can't really be compared.
We'll see how things shift in 2007.


Opinions are like assholes, everyone has them and yours stink more than mine.
Image
http://www.firefoxmyths.com
Shakedown 1979 wrote:Koma youre just the epitome of manliness
User avatar
Komataguri
Royalty
 
Posts: 5923
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Shakedown's House

Postby Lucky-7 » Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:39 pm

Console wars; Still a source of much drama between groups of 13 year old boys who feel their lives must be defined by dedication to which carefully marketed corporate device they prefer. Newsflash: They all suck and nobody gives a shit.


lawl, ITT; weaksauce trolling
User avatar
Lucky-7
Moderator
 
Posts: 5738
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 5:55 pm

Postby Vlastokov » Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:49 pm

PS3>Wii>Xbox360

Xbox needs more than Gears of War and Halo 3 to be worth the price. It'll be the same story as Xbox. They have a few trademark names and then the rest of the games suck balls.
NINJA GAIDEN, HALO, KOTOR, and FABLE. I dont' think there any any other worthwhile xbox EXCLUSIVES.

Sony's always had the best lineup, since PS1. I care a lot less about RPGs nowadays, though, since I'm always busy and have no time to dedicate to rpgs. Fight Night 3 is delicious, though. Resistance, as good as it looks, is only using 1 of the 6 graphic cells the PS3 comes with, and the internet capabilities of being able to update are topnotch. Me and my friends uploaded tons of shit onto his PS3 using USB drives. Hell, why fork over 100 more bucks for the 60GB when you can add on a external hardrive easily.

Wii I feel bad for categorising it with since it's clearly a different type of system already. Me and my friends beating the shit out of each other on Bomberman or being able to replay Sonic the Hedgehog without Emulators. It just feels fun. With a better library, they'll easily be no.1, but until then I don't think it's better than Sony.
Image
Komataguri wrote:But I only sing praise of the great Vlastokov

The omnipotent master of all creation!
User avatar
Vlastokov
I am Spam!
 
Posts: 11684
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: University of Florida/Miami, Florida

Postby Sai » Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:13 pm

NES > Sega Dreamcast > PS1 > Wii > xbox360 > PS2 > PS3 > xbox > N64 > Gamecube > Atari > Sega Genesis > Phantom > PSP > ball of string

If you disagree, please explain why you're wrong.
User avatar
Sai
Elite Leecher
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:13 pm

Postby Vlastokov » Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:18 pm

You forgot DS. FAIL
Image
Komataguri wrote:But I only sing praise of the great Vlastokov

The omnipotent master of all creation!
User avatar
Vlastokov
I am Spam!
 
Posts: 11684
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: University of Florida/Miami, Florida

Postby EvilSquirrel » Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:22 pm

Sai wrote:NES > Sega Dreamcast > PS1 > Wii > xbox360 > PS2 > PS3 > xbox > N64 > Gamecube > Atari > Sega Genesis > Phantom > PSP > ball of string

If you disagree, please explain why you're wrong.


I am not wrong! String, when combined with cat, is far more entertaining than console gaming
User avatar
EvilSquirrel
I <3 Forums
 
Posts: 3641
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:54 pm
Location: GENTLEMEN

Postby Khaotic » Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:41 pm

Sai wrote:NES > Sega Dreamcast > PS1 > Wii > xbox360 > PS2 > PS3 > xbox > N64 > Gamecube > Atari > Sega Genesis > Phantom > PSP > ball of string

If you disagree, please explain why you're wrong.


What are you ranking by <_<. Is it fun? Cause PS1 is more fun then dreamcast. Is it by power? Cause PS3 is the best <_<. I don't understand your logic!
Khaotic
Noob Lurker
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:34 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

PreviousNext

Return to Games Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests