Baka-Updates.com

by **cheesecake** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:33 pm

So let's say you're seeing someone who you're interested and pretty sure that person is interested in you as well. But then the girl/guy already has a girl/boyfriend. So pretty much you're the third person, wrecker, etc. So are you to blame?

Situation 1: Let's say you don't know that he/she has a girl/boyfriend. Are you still as horrible as he/she is? Should you feel bad about it?

Situation 2: You confronted him/her about whether he/she has a girl/boyfriend. He said no, but then you still have your suspicious. You goes against your gut and still continue your lil fling w/ him/her. How guilty are you?

And say you know a friend who is the third person in a relationship, are you obligate to talk her/him out of it? Should you support?

by **Nazaraki** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:57 pm

My rules: If the girl is intrested in me and im intrested in her i dont give a crap about her having a boyfriend

Everyones rules: everything is allowed in love and war

by **silverace99** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:02 pm

i'd have to disagree. My one and only rule is never go after someone else's woman (assuming you don't have something against the dude). If she wants you, she's got to wrap up her own shit first.

I like how you always post these things in the 3rd person cheese -_-

by **derrio** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:24 pm

If they're not married, fuck them, go for it.

by **Lucky-7** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:50 pm

If someone cant keep his/her partner happy, it's his/her own fault.

by **emetic** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:29 am

WELL
what an interesting question!
It might be better to deal with that yourself rather than asking the people here o-o idk.

by **Mystic Thunder** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:20 am

derrio wrote:If they're not married, fuck them, go for it.

exactly.

its only off limits if they are married. However if this person IS in a relationship then i suggest if this person wants to be with you or the other person. after you find out, you should make them choose between the two of you.

by **emetic** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 7:40 am

Mystic Thunder wrote:
derrio wrote:If they're not married, fuck them, go for it.

exactly.

its only off limits if they are married. However if this person IS in a relationship then i suggest if this person wants to be with you or the other person. after you find out, you should make them choose between the two of you.

Lol nah, marriage has nothing to do with it. Marriage is just a ceremony and a piece of paper o_o it has nothing to do with the emotional bond between two people.
I would say that it's rude and dirty to make a move on someone who has a partner, but if it works then they weren't meant to be in the first place.
The cool thing about it is that you'll end up as a couple who are perfectly willing to cheat.

by **Shakedown 1979** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:52 am

I totally agree with Luck and Derrio. If someone has a boy/girlfriend then that person is merely an obstacle in your way towards your goal

by **Mystic Thunder** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:04 am

emetic wrote:
Mystic Thunder wrote:
derrio wrote:If they're not married, fuck them, go for it.

exactly.

its only off limits if they are married. However if this person IS in a relationship then i suggest if this person wants to be with you or the other person. after you find out, you should make them choose between the two of you.

Lol nah, marriage has nothing to do with it. Marriage is just a ceremony and a piece of paper o_o it has nothing to do with the emotional bond between two people.
I would say that it's rude and dirty to make a move on someone who has a partner, but if it works then they weren't meant to be in the first place.
The cool thing about it is that you'll end up as a couple who are perfectly willing to cheat.

Well going after a married person labels you as a home wrecker

by **emetic** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:39 am

Mystic Thunder wrote:Well going after a married person labels you as a home wrecker

That's weird o-o the married cheater is just as bad.
Anyway, it shouldn't matter that they're married. If they're just a de facto couple then it doesn't seem any different to me.

by **Lucky-7** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:46 am

Mystic Thunder wrote:Well going after a married person labels you as a home wrecker

who cares?

by **Nazaraki** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:07 pm

who cares if they are married?

by **KasugaSan** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:38 pm

Nazaraki wrote:who cares if they are married?

no i think he meant who cares if a person going after married person is called a home wrecker

by **Mystic Thunder** » Thu Jul 10, 2008 1:04 am

Lucky-7 wrote:
Mystic Thunder wrote:Well going after a married person labels you as a home wrecker

who cares?

quite a few people actually

by **Shakedown 1979** » Thu Jul 10, 2008 1:58 am

Mystic Thunder wrote:
Lucky-7 wrote:
Mystic Thunder wrote:Well going after a married person labels you as a home wrecker

who cares?

quite a few people actually

I care

...

about getting ass

by **cheesecake** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:38 pm

Oi oi. I guess if the two are happy together than nothing else should count. If they really want to stay together than they'll get everything else taking care of so that they can be together. If one doesn't, then they're not meant to be.

:unsure:

Sounds easy enough right? Pffffft, easier said than done!

by **KasugaSan** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:18 pm

so you're still considering if you wanna be a third person or not?

by **Mystic Thunder** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 2:47 am

yeah i'd like to know what happened!!

by **Shakedown 1979** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:05 am

Are you a homewrecking harlot!?!?!?!

That sounds like the title to some raunchy porn ... kowaii

by **emetic** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:36 am

A homewrecking ocelot would be pretty scary too. Not in a porn kind of way though.

On that subject though, I bought a chess set and didn't notice until I got home that there were three white bishops and only 7 white pawns. :-(

That sounds pretty raunchy too.

by **Shakedown 1979** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:49 am

emetic wrote:A homewrecking ocelot would be pretty scary too. Not in a porn kind of way though.

Emmy why would you invite an ocelot in for tea in the first place?

by **cheesecake** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 2:38 pm

Well not quite sure if the third person is a third person anymore... >( Complication, complication. The guy is withholding the "information". The girl is too "attached" now to make a clean cut ...

Oi oi, say it's okay for you to just go with the flow and shouldn't care about the other person (the girl/boyfriend)

by **emetic** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:35 pm

cheesecake wrote:Well not quite sure if the third person is a third person anymore... >( Complication, complication. The guy is withholding the "information". The girl is too "attached" now to make a clean cut ...

Oi oi, say it's okay for you to just go with the flow and shouldn't care about the other person (the girl/boyfriend)

I think that this person who's having this scruple issue should go find a dude who doesn't have a girlfriend o-o
or just enjoy the single life while she can.

by **Singyz** » Tue Jul 15, 2008 9:53 pm

I say as long as he's not lying to either one of the parties involved, all is well. If he uses an excuse of "oh the gf is attached" to have you both, he needs a kick in the balls.

Baka-Updates.com

Are you guilty?

Are you guilty?

Who is online